Did you know that 74% of data breaches start with privileged credential abuse? According to Centrify’s Privileged Access Management in the Modern Threatscape survey, that is exactly so. Privilege attacks may come in many shapes and sizes. Let’s review briefly some variations of such attacks with a reference to real cases.
Privilege abuse: An employee of a third-party consulting firm stole the personal health identity data of 18,500 Anthem customers in 2017 Privilege escalation: Both the Home Depot and Target data breaches happened due to a third-party vendor’s credentials being somehow compromised, giving the hacker access to their networks Unauthorized access: An ex-employee of the engineering firm Allen & Hoshall appropriated some intellectual property, client correspondence and other sensitive data after using email credentials of a former colleague Human error: Two workers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) were granted access to 3,000 medical records of patients, despite the fact that such authorization was not related in any way to their job duties
Not using the least privilege principle is a recipe for disaster. As you can see, the ingredients may be different, but the bitter aftertaste is all the same. This article will focus on the 2017 Equifax data breach — an incident of massive proportions that could have been avoided if the proper defensive mechanisms were set in place.
Case study: Equifax data breach
The initial compromise took place on March 10, 2017. It was due to an unpatched vulnerability (CVE-2017-5638) existing in an Apache Struts instance running on Equifax’s web servers. Although that in itself was a significant security failure on the part of Equifax’s administrators, we will focus on their failure to apply least privilege controls. After the unknown hackers managed to access the web server, they could circumvent all security measures at the edge. Being in this position, attackers usually seek to scan internal networks in order to attempt to sneak into the database, where the real treasure is. This is a common lateral move tactic. It does not matter if the inner communications, where the applications are running, move around in the context of a private data center or a public cloud. Perhaps the most aggravating circumstance, as far as the principle of least privilege is concerned, is that internal networks’ traffic is often less monitored. Unfortunately, that was also the case with Equifax. In the period from May through July 2017, the criminals managed to get a hold of the private information of millions of people stored in multiple Equifax’s databases. Note that it was not until the middle of May when the attackers started to move laterally from the compromised server into other sectors of the network, siphoning data out of databases under the nose of the unsuspecting IT team. Prior to extracting the data, the bad guys encrypted it to make it blend with the rest of the internal network traffic. Digital forensic records showed that attackers had resided in Equifax’s networks for 76 days before being discovered. One of the reasons the cyber exploitation against Equifax was so successful was the fact that the company had permissive access controls accompanied by open network architecture. Hospitality is a good thing — within limits. Access management of Equifax could have been stricter. For example, access to users should be given on a need-to-know basis. If any user is regarded as trusted, malicious actors would not have a difficult time finding their way around the system. It will feel like home to them. No wonder that during the Equifax exploitation the attackers were able to execute up to 9,000 database queries — a fact that in itself should have been a giant red flag if the security team was more vigilant with respect to abnormal network traffic/behavior. One of the changes the new Equifax CISO, Jamil Farshchi, made in the wake of the breach was to strengthen access control protections and identity management across the entire company’s infrastructure. These aspects are central to the implementation of the least privilege principle. This is because keeping systems more siloed would mean that Equifax can effectively minimize the free-for-all of unneeded access. Though convenient, this bodes nothing but trouble. Segmentation could be an excellent technical measure for a company to enforce the principle of least privilege, as it allows only container connections-based whitelisting. Furthermore, a policy like that can enforce the rule that web servers (which are internal applications) are forbidden to connect to external networks or the database. Such a policy would have directly stopped Equifax’s malicious actors in their tracks, unable to move further from the initial zone of infiltration. This statement is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Take, for instance, the assumption investigators arrived at that after the first incursion the attackers had to stop because they had not had the expertise nor the tools to probe further. Likely, then the foothold had been sold to more experienced attackers. The point is that any obstacle you put in the way of the bad guys may buy you some time at least. “We had one of the most impactful breaches of all time,” stated Equifax CISO Jamil Farshchi. The personal data of some 143 million consumers (57% of US adult population) were stolen from Equifax. What makes this data breach potentially the biggest disaster is the permanent nature of the stolen private data:
Names Addresses Dates of birth Social Security numbers Drivers’ licenses Credit card numbers (about 200,000 clients)
The customers of Equifax who were most concerned about their credit score paid for its in-depth analysis only to have even more personal data stolen from them, including bank details. This exposed them to fraud and eventually damage to their credit score.
Conclusion
Current estimations show that the breach cost Equifax $1.4 billion on cleanup expenses, plus another $1.38 billion following a record-breaking settlement with the FTC in order to resolve consumer claims among other things. As we have seen, this costly disaster was likely avoidable. A zero-trust approach to Privileged Access Management (PAM), generally speaking, could make a huge difference as far as a given organization’s cybersecurity is concerned. In the end, a stringent least-privilege policy will not turn your organization into some kind of impregnable fortress, but it certainly would make things for hackers a lot more difficult and may save you from unnecessary worries.
